Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Language and how it is Devolving

Is Language Devolving?

      With the growth of television and the decline of Typography, one can see that language as a whole is slowing devolving. According to Amusing Ourselves to Death, during the 1600s, reading and writing was highly encouraged in the colonies in North America. The book goes on to say, that this encouragement was for all classes, not just the nobles. It also states that the common people were able to understand high diction speeches given by politicians, and then made their decision after. This was, however, before the television was invented. When the T.V. was first created, its popularity skyrocketed, which in turn lowered the ideas of reading and writing.
      According to Neil Postman, author of Amusing Ourselves to Death, the T.V. shows a type of discourse that abandons logic, reason, and sequence. Neil goes on to say that the information through the T.V. is not coherent, irrelevant, and does not contain any context, whereas Typography makes the human mind classify information, create inferences, and reason. Lastly, Neil states that T.V. is harming society for three reasons. First, children cannot learn information at school due to the fun, lively environment child T.V. shows create, like Elmo’s World. Second, the average American watches four and a half hours of television a day, which adds up to about twelve years of a person’s life. And third, the T.V. causes disinformation, which means everything that is important in a piece of information is lost. With the television causing so many problems within society, it is obvious that Typography and language as a whole is devolving. To truly engage in the reading and writing world, one must understand the meaning of the words he/she is reading, weigh ideas, compare and contrast topics, uncover lies, and connect one generalization to another. However, the T.V. pollutes public communication and its surrounding landscape, simply feeds information to it’s audience, fragments topics to show only a portion of it, and breaks the continuity of context. Language is clearly devolving due to television, and this is most clearly seen in reality shows. Within reality shows, curse/swear words are now common and words that do not even exist in the dictionary are used in everyday life. Not only that, but the Television, and its ways, are being copied by both the radio, and the newspapers, leaving language with no hope of recovery.  With the youngest generation being caught up in television, these habits in the decline of language are only going to get worse, and worse.

5 comments:

  1. I'd like to hear more on how specifically you think our modern 21st century life is contributing to the devolution of our language. You mention reality TV briefly--how do these shows change the way we interrelate? Beyond the bad language, I think this television trope has affected our society in some specific (and negative ways). These "real" people communicate very differently from scripted characters, for certain.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bryan, I enjoyed your analysis of how individuals must connect with language through reading and writing. You list off several necessities, like weighing and comparing ideas, as well as connecting the information that individuals receive. You contrast this with the loss of context within the television medium, a nice nod to Postman. On a technical note, I would try to include more explanation and development of ideas when you cite or reference a text. You provide many examples from Postman but you do not really build upon them with your own input. Otherwise, well done.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very well written post Brian. However, I do have a few responses seeing that you make have a lot of analysis regarding the content and form that language is presented in today’s society. First, the fact that typography is devolving and becoming less important in society does not entail that language is devolving. To look at the devolution of language through the decline of the popularity of certain mediums entails that language never evolves because language is always transferring between different mediums. It would be impossible to tell which switch between mediums represents the devolution and which represent the evolution of language from just the merits of the mediums themselves. For instance, under your standard, when humans began to rely on typography more than speech in the era that you reference in your first paragraph, language would be devolving because typography allowed the compiling of the information that was necessary to build the atomic bomb, which led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Japanese in WWII. When you try to evaluate the evolution of language based upon the advantages and disadvantages to certain mediums, it is impossible to tell whether language is devolving because the debate becomes centered on the medium and not language itself. Even Neil Postman disapproves of the blurring of language and its mediums since it frequently leads to not finding truth as truth can never be found regarding language when we are distracted by the merits of its mediums.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bryan, I really liked the examples that you used in your blog and thought that they contributed and enhanced the quality of your writing extremely well. However, similar to others stance in previous comments I would say that language is not devolving because of the less amount of interest in Typography as much as a lack of interest in overall language itself and the desire to learn in our culture. Overall, I thought you had a lot of good points and presented a very strong case.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well thought out response, Chess Piece. I agree with your point that the difference between reading and watching is that information must be fully processed to understand what exactly is being read, unlike television. I believe this point hasn't been brought up enough when we talk about the nature of television versus books, and I'm glad to see that someone is causing discussion on the mater. I also fully agree with the idea of a devolution that will slowly spiral out of control when younger generations are exposed to more and more television over typography like books.

    ReplyDelete